Skip to main content

Written Communication

The ability to develop, convey, and exchange ideas in writing, as appropriate to a given context and audience. Degree graduates will express themselves effectively in a variety of written forms.

Student Learning Outcomes

Who are we assessing?

Students enrolled in College Composition I & II (ENG 111 & 112).

How is performance rated?

A rubric, based on the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) Written Communication & Reading VALUE Rubrics, was used to evaluate work products of students in the selected courses.

View Rubric

What score do we expect?

75% of students will receive a score of 2 (minimally meets expectations) or higher on communicating a central idea (or thesis) in a manner appropriate to the audience and occasion.

What did we find?

The target score was met with 87.8% of students scoring a 2 (minimally meets expectations) or higher.

The target score was met with 87.8% of students scoring a 2 (minimally meets expectations) or higher.

Where do we go from here?

At the beginning of each academic year, the General Education Committee reviews assessment findings to evaluate student achievement of General Education outcomes. The committee uses these results to identify trends, determine improvement priorities, and implement actions designed to strengthen student learning and program effectiveness.

Who are we assessing?

Students enrolled in College Composition I & II (ENG 111 & 112).

How is performance rated?

A rubric, based on the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) Written Communication & Reading VALUE Rubrics, was used to evaluate work products of students in the selected courses.

View Rubric

What score do we expect?

75% of students will receive a score of 2 (minimally meets expectations) or higher on demonstrating critical thinking to evaluate and integrate qualitative and/or quantitative evidence in written communication.

What did we find?

The target score was met with 83.6% of students scoring a 2 (minimally meets expectations) or higher.

The target score was met with 83.6% of students scoring a 2 (minimally meets expectations) or higher.

Where do we go from here?

At the beginning of each academic year, the General Education Committee reviews assessment findings to evaluate student achievement of General Education outcomes. The committee uses these results to identify trends, determine improvement priorities, and implement actions designed to strengthen student learning and program effectiveness.

Who are we assessing?

Students enrolled in College Composition I & II (ENG 111 & 112).

How is performance rated?

A rubric, based on the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) Written Communication & Reading VALUE Rubrics, was used to evaluate work products of students in the selected courses.

View Rubric

What score do we expect?

75% of students will receive a score of 2 (minimally meets expectations) or higher on demonstrating critical reading proficiency by identifying rhetorical patterns, main and supporting ideas, and appropriate responses to college-level texts.

What did we find?

The target score was met with 86.8% of students scoring a 2 (minimally meets expectations) or higher.

The target score was met with 86.8% of students scoring a 2 (minimally meets expectations) or higher.

Where do we go from here?

At the beginning of each academic year, the General Education Committee reviews assessment findings to evaluate student achievement of General Education outcomes. The committee uses these results to identify trends, determine improvement priorities, and implement actions designed to strengthen student learning and program effectiveness.